Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

When I read the book the first time, 35 years ago, I thought it was fantastic. Jan Carlzon delivers so many insights into the power of decentralized decisionmakingdecision making, and I still think his writing is cutting-edge in the Leadership genre.

...

Have you sometimes been struck by the change in behavior from people who are appointed to a managerial position? I certainly have. With curiosity, I have observed people reshape and take on behaviors they used to criticize. It seems like many are not aware of how the new responsibility affects them.

Even with the best intention, leaders have a hard time

fail to avoid the kind of behavior they used to criticize. To become an admired and effective leader, at any level of an organization, is probably one of the most challenging things to do.

When looking at research, the prevailing experience of employees is that most managers do not have the talent to manage effectively. Despite the massive information flow on Leadership, bad Management appears to be the dominating rule.

I do think people know a lot about Leadership and how to create a great workplace. Then why do a lot of people and I believe there is such a big gap to fill? How can it be this difficult? But even with the best intention, it is a challenge to become an admired leader who makes people grow. Probably one of the most challenging things to do. Why is so difficult to take on a role that everybody wants?

Self-awareness

For those of us who love quadrants, the Johari Window is a straight forward model explaining how hard it is to understand our behavior. Few people can appreciate their critical Blind Spotblindspot, and it can be hard to get the feedback needed to improve.

A more comprehensive picture of the Blind Spot blindspot phenomenon may be found in the research on behavior among leaders and managers conducted by Simon Elvnäs Simon Elvnäs at the Royal Technical High-school (KTH) in Stockholm.  

Simon Elvnäs and Simon Elvnäs and his group of researchers filmed more than 400 managers on-site in their everyday environment. After that, all All films were analyzed and categorized into thousands of different leadership behaviors. The result was astonishing; Managers make the least of what has a positive impact on the organization and what they want to do, and most of what employees do not need. Simply expressed: managers do not, at all, do what they think they do.

In many cases, the work of Simon Elvnäs has helped managers change their behaviors. It might be a painful experience to watch yourself, but the films appear to provide beneficial feedback.

Not everyone has will have the opportunity to get filmed and analyzed by scientists. Never the less all my sources tell the same: honest and actionable feedback makes the difference. Then how can leaders get the feedback and the insights about how others perceive them?

The power of feedback

like jc

Honest feedback is like a valuable gift you get from someone who likes you. It might sound trivial to ask for feedback, but you cannot merely order a person to give this gift to you. Instead, you have to earn it by opening up show you need the feedback and take care of it. It is especially hard for managers to get the feedback they need since subordinates often have the genius to filter out some criticism.

My Marcus Buckingham "Source of truth for my reaction."

It is easy to find a lot of writing about the importance of feedback. In literature

Feedback is one of the most

...

Feedback, Feedback, and Feedback

There is so much writing about feedback and it seems to be widely used. Just to pick one example: A 10-Year Study Reveals What Great Executives Know and Do. One of the statements, in this article by Ron Carucci, is, where it says: "Exceptional executives actively solicit feedback about how others experience them."

Just be careful; how to give and take feedback is not the easiest thing.

This is how to do it

But despite all writing and talking about feedback, I don’t see much of it. Especially not the feedback which helps people improve. What is your experience?

I think many of us are too afraid of giving feedback and thus get little practice. This counts for both formal and informal leadership. We don't want to hurt or interfere. When the feedback sometimes comes out, it is to blunt and does nothing else then moving people into defense mode.

I constantly hear people speaking negatively about others who are not present. I hear it almost everywhere and I think it is bad behavior and cowardliness. It does not help the person being spoken about, nor does it benefit an organization. I think this is the core thing we all need to improve. Stop gossiping, start feedbacking!

Honest feedback, as Jan Carlzon got, should be treated as a valuable gift you get from someone who likes you. Easy to say, but it can be hard to even give and receive positive feedback. In many cases, feedback is perceived as criticism which makes people pull back or go into defense mode.

The how

Marcus Buckingham has a lot to say about workable feedback. His main advice is that feedback should not be opinions for what to do, but all be about a reaction. “When you did or said <something> It made me understood, feel or think <something>.” If it is possible to expand and also explain the input can be even more useful.

“I care enough to be honest with you.”

“I would really like to get your feedback which makes me understand how I can support others.

Inspire people to be a better version of themselves.

How to get started

Select a person whom you trust, to be honest, and open to you. Preferably this person has an interest and experience in personal coaching. If not, ask the person to dive into this highly important subject.

...

Kom ihåg

It might sound trivial to ask for feedback, but you cannot merely order a person to give this gift to you. Instead, you have to earn it by opening up show you need the feedback and take care of it. It is especially hard for managers to get the feedback they need since subordinates often have the genius to filter out some criticism.